<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking Funding?</title>
	<link>http://www.moneyandsoftware.com/2007/03/29/taking-funding/</link>
	<description>Adventures in software, finance and the intersections</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Money and Software :: Best software startup information - Week 13</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyandsoftware.com/2007/03/29/taking-funding/#comment-171</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.moneyandsoftware.com/2007/03/29/taking-funding/#comment-171</guid>
					<description>[...] As I wrote a couple weeks ago, many successful founders believe that one-person ISVs are much less likely to succeed than multi-person companies.  Several micro-ISV founders disagree with that premise.  One pointed out an old strategy letter discussing two types of businesses and how they act differently.  I found this interesting.  Our business has few competitors and strong lock-in, so the advice would be to use the get-big-fast model.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] As I wrote a couple weeks ago, many successful founders believe that one-person ISVs are much less likely to succeed than multi-person companies.  Several micro-ISV founders disagree with that premise.  One pointed out an old strategy letter discussing two types of businesses and how they act differently.  I found this interesting.  Our business has few competitors and strong lock-in, so the advice would be to use the get-big-fast model.  [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
